|
Diary
of a Teddy boy. Hip before the hippies. Mim Scala. Review Publishing,
#9.99 by Jack McLean
The Herald
Subtitled ''a memoir of the long sixties'', the period covered is from
the mid-fifties to the end of the seventies and I recognised it all.
I also recognised the author, whom I remember meeting in various smart
pubs and clubs in Chelsea's King's Road when that was where we swung
when Chelsea was swinging. As I remember Mim he was a wide-boy on the
make, involved in the film and record industry, who dressed like a hippie
but who was very good company. For most of this autobiography he still
is. His account of the early years of rock'n'roll and coffee bars will
strike, what else, chords with those of us who were around when the
greyness of post-war Britain got all shook up and burst into colour.
This is not hyperbole either. I can remember it: suddenly, instead of
grim gaberdine raincoats and short back'n'sides, there were bop hairstyles
and drape jackets. The early fifties had an air of 10 Rillington Place,
for heaven's sake. As John Lennon once said: ''Nothing meant anything
until Elvis.'' Scala captures the strange narcissism of the period.
All goes well right through the early days of the Beat boom, characterised
by the young popsters dressing in expensive but outrageous suits and
sharp shirts and ties. Where the period goes off the rails, and indeed
this memoir as well, starts about the time when the hippies came in
and the love generation discovered how to take themselves seriously,
which is far more than they had a right to do. But after 1969 in this
account both the book and Mim Scala become very tiresome indeed. I'd
forgotten how much contempt I had for hippies but this brought it all
back. The origins of political correctness and social-workerism lie
with the sad stupidity and rank ignorance of the hippie generation.
The second half of this book contains all the usual nonsense, mysticism,
eastern religions, lots of drugs, travelling in north Africa, Jack Kerouac,
The Whole Earth Catalogue; rubbish, all of it. It's difficult to see
how the author achieves his effects really. Right up till he encounters
the salivating drivel of the late sixties with all that love going about
he writes crisply and with authority. It's Mile End Road cockiness,
sashaying through the spivvery of Soho and the markets, the gambling
club scene of the late fifties and early sixties before betting was
legalised. But later his tone changes to one of druggy, bloviating bombast.
Like any decent reviewer I tried to put myself in the reader's shoes.
I couldn't. I've reviewed this in my own. In the first half they were
elegant winklepickers. The second half? Tackety boots. But don't let
the second half of the book put you off: the first half is too good
to miss.
Source:
The Herald (Glasgow) Sat 24-Feb-2001 www.theherald.co.uk
© SMG Newspapers, 2001. Reproduced with permission.
|